J. Holdren: Forced Abortions, Mass Sterilization [Needed] - BS!

Save Article As PDF

Snipped from ScienceBlogs.com.

Wow, I am deeply saddened by the continually sinking ship that is our mass media. Why am I so sad? Well, just shortly after writing my story on how media matters, I was made aware of this self-congratulatory, irrational piece of propaganda that passes as journalism only if you belong to the ideological group that is the neo-conservatory, fear mongerers. Unfortunately, this wonderful representation of de-evolution was posted at the Washington Times.

It was written by sensationalist, entertainer Amanda Carpenter. The article by Carpenter tries to damage Holdren’s reputation by using out of context, Strawman fallacies and sensationalizing facts to create a perception of possible totalitarianism by Obama’s new appointment. What a load of horseshit! Thank god there are antagonists to the limbic-driven, blow-hards, like Ms. Carpenter, that actually use their cerebral cortex. These antagonists would be the smart people.

Jessica Palmer, a biologist, professor and author of Bioephemera, a science blog, took to task to blow the blow-hard right out of the water. I recommend you read her full post as she goes to town and really parses every bit of irrationality that’s in Ms. Carpenter’s article.

Here is a small portion of the article:

The sad thing here is that Carpenter’s story, like the extremist blog post that appears to be her only source (which I’ll discuss later), doesn’t recognize the distinction between talking about something and endorsing something. That distinction is absolutely central to science: science is all about discussing, testing, and evaluating many possibilities - hypotheses - until the evidence endorses one hypothesis over the others. It’s also central to policy, in which multiple policy options are described prior to one being recommended. In fact, this distinction is central to all academic fields. Does a historian comparing the draconian regimes of Hitler, Mussolini and Kim Jong Il automatically support totalitarianism? Highly unlikely - unless the historian actually says he/she advocates a dictator’s policies.

If you think that she should be fired for what she does to America’s democracy or want to give her a piece of your mind, then contact her and leave a comment.

Read Full Article Here!

  • Here is the comment I sent Ms. Carpenter via the above comment link:

    I just wanted to let you know that Jessica Palmer over at Bioephemera, a science blog, has just revealed how your so-called "journalism" is unintelligent and irresponsible. The article she addresses is your John Holdren piece. I would like to also point out that I have helped spread the word as well.

    I would like to refer you to an article of mine that argues why your style of journalism is detrimental to our democracy. Unbiased and unfiltered information should be a constitutional right. Although, I am sure you or your employer may disagree since everyone has an agenda nowadays, but journalists in the past used to make valiant attempts to not let their bias influence their reporting. I guess that is not desired any more, huh?

    Oh, and next time, I wouldn't use a blog as a reference for journalism. It's slightly irresponsible.

    Anyways, have a great day.

    Sincerely,

    Cerebrl
    Blog4Brains.com
blog comments powered by Disqus