Isn’t Palin still the Governor of Alaska?
Snipped from HuffingtonPost.com.
Looks like Sarah Palin hasn’t come to reality yet. Doesn’t she remember? She has a state to run. Or, did she forget that during her imaginative run for President … ahem, Vice Presidency? Well, it looks like the natives are getting restless.
Oh, and it looks like she isn’t going to give up the 150,000 dollar wardrobe either. Wow, that’s gotta hurt!
Here is a small portion of the article:
Governor Palin Neglects Alaska Duties for Partisan Stumping on Campaign Trail in Georgia
Alaska faces challenges that need attention now
Anchorage - While Gov. Sarah Palin is out of state again, this time in Georgia campaigning for incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss on the eve of the runoff election, Alaska faces challenges including a lack of leadership from the Governor.
Palin will stump for Chambliss, the draft-evading incumbent Republican who waged a notoriously misleading campaign against a decorated war hero, at rallies Monday in Atlanta, Augusta, Savannah and Perry, Georgia. Palin has been back in Alaska at work for only a few days since running for vice president.
‘Alaskans need our Governor here earning her salary and working on key problems facing Alaska families,’ said Alaska Democratic Party Chair Patti Higgins.
Alaska is facing significant challenges, Higgins said, including:
…
2 Responses to “Isn’t Palin still the Governor of Alaska?”
Leave a Reply
-
Name: [Cerebrl]
Email:
Web Site: http://www.blog4brains.com
Bio: I am the editor-in-chief of Blog4Brains.com, and would like to thank you for your interest in this site. I welcome any and all feedback. Please, use the link above to personally email me, or comment below. Enjoy!
-
Rate This Site!
Proudly powered by WordPress.
December 4th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Palin’s absence from Alaska is just part of doing her bit for smaller government.
December 4th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Smaller government? Sure.
If by smaller, you mean smaller, less regulation for corporations for raping the people, the earth and the economy for unlimited growth at any cost, but more draconian involvement with your civil liberties, sexual/reproductive rights, more rewriting of the constitution to adopt a more religiously controlled government, less scientific progress and more irrationally motivated policy making … oh, and a larger industrial military complex that consumes more of our dwindling GDP than anything else to defend ourselves from a threat that does not match our own self-righteous, materialistic, self-destructive ideology, then sure, you right!
And if you were being sarcastic then … uh, h-a?!
Thanks for you comment!
[Cerebrl]