Where Does the Mind Reside? In Every Cell of the Body?

Save Article As PDF

mindbust.jpgHave you ever wondered about those people who get transplanted organs from other people and whether or not they feel any different with someone else’s organs? Well, researchers are finding out that there may be something with having another’s organ within you. There have been startling reports of how people have taken on personality quirks, mannerisms and desires from people from whom they received their hearts. Some of these reports are truly remarkable and will really make you think. I have read in a couple of sources that the mind is not in the brain. Scientists have studied, sliced, magnified and electrified the brain to exhastion, and in the end, there is still no central source or processing unit. Meaning, no one is behind the wheel, so to speak. So if it is not in the brain, where does it exist and what makes us… well, us? Is it in every organ, tissue, cell? Is our mind encoded in our DNA?

As reported in the June, 07, Ode magazine, there was a woman, Glenda, who lost her husband, David, in a car crash. David stipulated that he wanted his organs to be available for transplant before he was unexpectedly killed. Glenda made David’s heart available to a young Spanish-speaking man and went on with her life. A few years later, as a part of a study by neuro-psychologist Paul Pearsall, she met the man who had received her late husband’s heart. When she met the man, she was suddenly filled with emotion and asked if she could put her hand on the man’s chest. As she did she said, “I love you David. Everything’s copacetic.” The young man’s mother standing near by was startled when she heard the word “copacetic”. She said that the first thing her son said after the operation was that word. The mother continued by saying that he never said that word before the operation and says it all the time now. But the funniest thing is that the word doesn’t even exist in Spanish.

There were other things that had changed about the young man. Before, he had been a health-conscious vegitarian. After the transplant he craved meat and greasy food. He had loved heavy metal music before. Now he listens to nothing but fifties rock ‘n’ roll. Glenda reported to the mother that David had been an ardent meat-lover and played in a old rock ‘n’ roll band. What does this mean? Obviously there is more to our existence than we think. Our brain might be just a part of the mind, quite an essential part, but a part none-the-less.

There are other remarkable examples of transplanted hearts with some type of “mind” still attached with it. An eight year-old girl received the heart of a ten year-old girl who had been murdered. The recipient ended up in a psychiatrist’s office with recurrent nightmares about her donor’s murderer. She proclaimed to the psychiatrist that she knew who the murderer was. After police were contacted, with the girl’s instructions, the police were able to track down the murderer. The man was convicted on evidence the girl had provided concerning the time, the weapon, the place, the clothes he wore, and what his victim told him. Everything that she had reported turned out to be true.

Then there was the eight year-old Jewish boy who died in a car wreck whose heart was donated to a three year-old Arab girl. As soon as the girl woke up from the anaesthesia after surgery, she asked by name for a particular type of Jewish candy she could not have known existed.

In a book written by Paul Pearsall, Heart's Code, Thecalled The Heart’s Code, he provides other remarkable examples of transplanted hearts with memories, traits or personalities. Pearsall argues that the brain is not the only center of human intelligence. He says that the heart carries equal importance. And, he says that the body is made up of cells that transmit “information” in which the cells communicate this information to each other electromagnetically. Thus, he continues to state, “a transplanted organ can continue to broadcast old information.

Another strange example of our unordinary attachment to our bodies is the Phantom Limb or Pain Syndrome (PLS). PLS is a strange phenomenon where an amputee will still have “feeling” or “pain” associated with the lost limb. Patients will often complain about their missing leg or arm hurting, in an uncomfortable position, or itches. There have been quite a few studies where researchers have conducted simple experiments with sufferers of PLS. One such study was done by Ramachandran & Blakeslee. Here is what was said about one such study:

I placed a coffee cup in front of John and asked him to grab it [with his phantom limb]. Just as he said he was reaching out, I yanked the cup away.
“Ow!” he yelled. “Don’t do that!”
“What’s the matter?”
“Don’t do that”, he repeated. “I had just got my fingers around the cup handle when you pulled it. That really hurts!”
Hold on a minute. I wrench a real cup from phantom fingers and the person yells, ouch! The fingers were illusory, but the pain was real - indeed, so intense that I dared not repeat the experiment.

– Ramachandran, Phantoms in the Brain, p. 43. (Ramachandran & Blakeslee 1998)

Is this consistent with the cell communication? Does the remaining stub continue to broadcast signals to the brain that communicates that the missing limb is still there? The strangest and probably the most difficult to understand is how there have been reports of children born with missing limbs, yet they too can have problems with phantom limb syndrome. Does it go back even further, suggesting that our “mind” is designed to perceive our bodies to be normal even if one is born deformed? This would suggest nature creates our mind, and nurture develops the brain. This may explain how some people no matter how they are brought up are the antithesis of what they “should” be.

What is interesting about this is that the medical community has suppressed a lot of this information in fear that if people were made aware of these types of carryover memories that they may not be as anxious to get transplants. So there are critics out there who even when presented with all the evidence, deny the existence of these claims. They even go on to assert that recipients who get transplants can be affected with these types of strange behaviors due to the heavy drugs that they are taking.

Although I find the latter absolutely ridiculous in an attempt to explain these strange phenomena, it is sad that the medical community will not address these issues. If we could put aside our fears and greed for money, we might be able to tap into what and who we really are. Is our mind the same thing as a soul or spirit, where the “energy” of the limb is still present without its physical counterpart? Or the organ still carries the energy of its prior owner, and its memory, traits and personality comes along with it? Who knows, but if we don’t allow ourselves and our scientific professionals the freedom to study and research this subject, we could miss out on something that could explain what it means to be alive.

  • I don't understand why people are so afraid of believing something that has not been completely proven yet. All of the world's most intelligent people were that way because they were not afraid of pushing the boundaries between science and imagination. Sometimes the imagination or pure idea is the first step in discovery.

    Skepticism is in ways a lot like conservativism. People get some kind of theoretical high out of being labeled the "most" conservative, similar to being labeled the "most" skeptical. Now of course I am not saying believe in anything as it is real. I am just saying why not believe in the possibility of things. We need to shake the absolutes out of our reality as the quantum world has already proven that there is no such thing as an absolute.

    Truth is nothing but an impossible ideology. The faster we can realize that there is no absolute and there is no "truth", the faster we as a species can move forward. Thanks for your comments and hope to hear from you all again soon.
  • Adam
    This stuff is always anecdotal. Why can't this be tested? All it would take would be a minimal skin graft from one person to another. You could even test it on animals to see if they know things they couldn't have unless they had some knowledge from the donors.

    Once this research is repeated and proven by a panel of scientists I will be interested.
  • Kilgore -- Of course this is not a proven theory. Neither is it purely scientific. This article is supposed to represent a thought experiment which will be a new category of ours. These kind of articles will either not have a specific answer because our science has not proven it yet or will never have an answer as to it not being "in the realm of provability."

    But, this does not mean we should ignore the issues and not explore the ideas, but we should use this as mental yoga -- stretching and strengthening the brain in ways never attempted before. This is the realm I like to play in constantly. I too wonder about spirits, souls or "energies" and whether it is real or not. With the fact that I cannot prove it either way, the possibility still exists in my mind. Kind of like Schroedinger's Cat in a way. We have just not found out how to open the box to find out the existence of its state.

    Stan -- you are exactly right. This is not too scientific, but does that mean we cannot explore the idea? All "things" that are now proven scientific started out not too scientific when they are first discovered. Many ideas are just that -- ideas -- before they are researched, manipulated, calculated and then finally proven true or false. Until that time, I will always explore the realm of the unknown.

    And as far as the card table and the holding of hands... it is cool as long as you don't say "Bloody Mary" three times in a row. Why is that? I am too afraid to tell you, so try it and find out! Wa ha ha ha!
  • Stan Nodvik
    These are anecdotal evidence, not too scientific. Set up a card table, turn out the lights, hold hands with others, and wait for a rap on the table.
  • Thats quite a thing to try to wrap your heart/brain around. Sorry little joke there. I find this very interesting and hope to look into it further at the same time I question some of your conclusions. I'm pretty cynical when it come to many things but my optimism want to point out another option as to why Doctor might not want to divulge this information. First it doesn't exactly sound like a proven theory, it sounds like and interesting theory that need to be researched. More importantly as a doctor trying to save someones life with a transplant you've already told them how it could fail, it could be rejected, the will die without the transplant and they might die with the transplant, would you really want to burden them with, "Oh and if you weren't worried enough there is a theory that you may pick up some personality traits from the donor, like on Seinfeld when Jerry got Krammers blood."

    The other thing I question is your talk of souls, to me this seems like more evidence of a materialistic mind. Otherwise we are talking about a divisible soul, which just seems weird, but then again I think the ideas of souls are weird to begin with. Seriously though if this theory is correct then it means personality and even memories can be transfered from one person to another via organ transplant, this would confirm that memories and personality are material traits. If memory and personality are not part of the soul, then what is left for the soul to do? Of course it also means that we have a lot left to learn about what makes us tick, but I think any scientist would agree with that anyway.

    Great article Unum lots to think about, by the way, your quite the fan of Ode magazine huh? Thanks for the brain (heart?) candy.
blog comments powered by Disqus