What Effects Will Technology Have On The ‘Community’?

roadtoat.jpgWe, as a global organism, are experiencing the greatest rate of change this world has ever seen. Ever since the industrial revolution, we have seen everything from humans taking flight, man landing on the Moon, creation of quantum mechanics, and the invention of the Internet. All this within about a hundred years of time. That amount of extrinsic evolution would have normally taken hundreds, if not thousands of years. The incredible rate of environmental (non-natural) change we are experiencing has a profound affect on how we function as a global and local community, but what are the consequences?

Let’s use basic organisms as an analogy. Any organism, no matter the size or complexity, has to be able to adapt to its environment to survive. Whether it’s climate change, food change, geographic change or anything else, it has to be able to adapt that change into its DNA to guarantee its ability to continue to thrive. That is how moths ended up looking like the bark of a tree and how the Aye-Aye has that narrow middle finger (see this article for images and video). Now, if this change happens too quickly, we will end up wiping out the species. Hence our involvement with the ecosystem and the endangering of many organisms.

The reason for this is quite simple. When reproduction of any organism occurs, you get accidental and random mutations of DNA once in a while. These mutations can create anomalies that strengthen an organism’s ability to survive, or the mutation will die off. When the environment changes, the organisms that carry the DNA that may allow for the change survives reproducing with others that survive as well continuing the species. The organisms that were missing this essential DNA mutation will die off. But, if the environmental change is less than the amount of generations it takes to adapt, it will not allow enough time for the organisms that may have mutated to reproduce and create a viable colony to support its survival. Then the species will die out.

This is why I bring up the speed in which these environmental changes occur. We as humans can only evolve so fast. Take the invention or creation of the spoken word. It took us tens of thousands of years to develop the incredible ability to communicate verbally. But, this is face to face communication that contains thousands of “units” of non-verbal communication. As we speak to someone, we are unconsciously aware of all these units, and they assist us in interpreting what the other is saying. This is all intrinsic and is not necessarily voluntary. But, the technology, like IMing, online chatting or Texting, revolution has stripped away all those essential units, and left us with a cold, dry, string of letters or symbols such as [:)].




These strings of letters that are mostly misspelled and abbreviated have left us with very little to process. We are slowly removing these units of communication from the way we, well, communicate. We start to become unaware of the true intention of the message. The missing units are like food to the brain, and when food (units) become scarce, the organism needs to adapt to survive. The problem with this is we are not left with enough time to allow our minds/DNA to intrinsically adapt to these ‘environmental’ changes. With the rate of change that is now existing, there is no way for our thousand year old communicative brain to adapt to the scarce units to process since all of this is happening within one generation.

So, we are then left in a quandary. We are in the age of efficiency, so we start to prefer texting, chatting, IMing because of its incredible efficiency, but at the cost of losing the essential units. And because of the missing units, we are left with an unknown intention; our fears and insecurities begin to run wild as we regress from real human relationships and physical encounters.

This allows us to never face our demons or fears, and it exacerbates our aloneness. When people were forced to talk to each other in person, there would be times when the other would disagree, and the two of them would have to work it out in a respectful and honorable way or real consequences would ignite. This is where human development and growth comes from. But when people are given the chance to just ignore or hide from any contrarian thought and if a confrontation takes place, there is no accountability for actions made; these people will never be forced to develop and grow. We as a populace will regress from the physical community as we become more entangled in the online version, and as the world becomes smaller, the walls between each other will grow taller.

So what is the answer to this ‘catch 22′? Well, we need to do away with communities that do not have any kind of regulation, and have no accountability for acts of negativity and disrespect (like digg, myspace…). We need to create online networks that simulate real physical networks of physical people and positively reward people for honorable behavior and create consequences for negative behavior (Newsvine). In doing this, we will strengthen and mimic real world scenarios. We need to constantly keep ourselves in check and not allow our fears and insecurities to get the best of us, forever pushing ourselves to engage in discussions of opposing thought, but not allowing ourselves to be negative or disrespectful.

We need to continue to remind ourselves that there is a human being on the receiving end of our message, and that global good will always outweigh any egotistical, shallow reward by being disrespectful, rude or teaching someone a lesson with f*#k off, your stupid, or what a waste of…, etc.

And, by all means, do not allow the art of language to die off to be replaced with “stfu n00b u sukc ih8u gfy”! or WTF. Sorry, but being expressive with the art of language will always translate better than a string of acronyms that are as sterile and generic as “I like long walks on the beach, I listen to all kinds of music, I don’t know, where do you wanna eat?”. In the end, we need to always look ahead and think of all these consequences that might follow with the next release of Whatever Version 2.X.X…



Like what you read? Share it! These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Netvouz
  • ThisNext
  • blogmarks
  • Fark

7 Comments so far

  1. Stan Nodvik March 7th, 2007 9:11 am

    Great educational article:
    What would you have to say about humor and using humor? Right now in text-yacking, one who tells a joke needs to add a smiley face to indicate, it’s a joke. I don’t hear any laughter either. Nevertheless, oh well….

  2. Stan Nodvik March 7th, 2007 11:15 am

    What was NOT the first joke Eve told Adam:
    “Your zipper’s down.”

  3. cerebral March 7th, 2007 2:57 pm

    Stan, you are always cracking us up over here! Humor is hard when commenting or chatting online. I always have to put [sarcasm] or :) after everything, or people take me too seriously. We are just missing too many of the non-verbal units of information to get across all the subtleties in humor.

    Then you have people that are so damn illiterate that actually writing out sentences with adjectives and adverbs is just too hard. Not to be mean or anything, but damn, it is frustrating to see the English language being massacred like it is today.

  4. Stan Nodvik March 8th, 2007 4:20 am

    Hey you, yes YOU! In case you’re still in the dark about what was going on yesterday, you need to read the above article, especially the comment by Cerebrum on humor icons and their ineffectiveness; We did a classic Jack Benny ‘runnin joke’ that Jack’s writers invented which would turn hilarous during that week’s show skit with dozens of laughs each time the original gag was oh, so slightly switched. Maybe Jack’s version of the runnnin’ joke worked 10 to 20 times each night. ( You can still get Jack Benny’ shows from Apple’s Itunes.) Our runnin’ joke was somewhat different in form and structure.

    None of guys at the Blog4Brains site were in on it, not even Unum. But very earily in the comic routine, it was evident that Cerebrum caught on and fed in some right and good placement of stuff. Kilgore Trout was in on it with a slight-of-comment on Cheny’s b-but…which gave a spin gag: ‘Please, someone help me.’ Thanks, Kilroge for supplying the credibility. None of yesterday jokes were scripted but improvised with some very lucky fit-to-order posted comments and reposting previous comments. And that film short/short by the two Army soldiers in Iraq led off just fine and set up the two home sabotage comments. These two home sabotage posting are authentic and now can be found on the site under the Army soldiers’ film clip.

    Will you please drop the seriousness, and have a good laugh? You know you have a sense of humor. And I certainly am not going to apologize to anyone if they think I should. And I’m not putting on smiliey faces when I write something funny. Our problem is the limited new technology, Stupid. Read the above article AGAIN!

  5. kilgore trout March 8th, 2007 10:28 am

    I don’t think its the text itself that will ruin society, we’ve had books for a long time, and its definitely possible to pull of great humor with only text. As we have shown here on many occasions. What I think is ruining community is what you mentioned with the fact that we can completely isolate ourselves even in crowds.

    But as were on a bit of a humor bend I had to end with a stupid joke so I looked up stupid jokes and found a stupid joke generator and heres what I got.

    This redneck felt sick and decided to go to the doctor. The doctor examining him says, ‘Well, I can’t seem to find the problem, but I think it has something to do with alcohol.’

    The redneck replies, ‘Well, then, I’ll come back when you’re sober.’

  6. cerebral March 8th, 2007 10:43 pm

    Kilgore — You are right, it is not text itself, but how we apply the text. Books are written by people that take much care in the words used. There is much thought on adjectives, adverbs, tone of writing and so on. This is not the same type of writing that is happening across the globe with online chatting. Efficiency is the first priority, being cute, cool or funny is the second and last is the quality of the writing.

    When, “Hey, how have you been? We have really missed you around here. We were laughing so hard from your last comment you made, my abs were sore for days. Hope to see you again,” with, “Sup? missed ya, lafin’ at U. SUL.” We are missing the whole point of a conversation.

    As far as humor goes, yea, it works when you write the whole thing out. But try to write out that joke on a cell phone with only a minute or two to spare. We are losing our craft, and it is being replaced with the age of immediate gratification.

  7. Kilgore Trout March 9th, 2007 2:37 pm

    thats why my cell phone has a full key board, and I tell people to STFU already and just call, you have phone in your hand obviously, use the green button and talk to me.

    absolute total agreement on the “age of immediate gratification” its basically disgusting how true that is in every realm of American society.

Leave a reply

_LIVE COMMENT PREVIEW_______________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________________________



 

Subscribe without commenting