Why Flex-Fuel Is America’s Next Biggest Blunder — Part Two

Save Article As PDF

pmv.jpgHopefully you have read Part One of this article. If you have not, it is a realistic counterpart to our next great blunder of our government, Flex-Fuel Technology.

So, what is the answer to this dizzying conundrum of alternative fuels? HYBRID TECHNOLOGY!! Well, how about something even better? I believe in combining our most advanced technology — a plug-in hybrid flex-fuel automobile that gets its electrical power from solar panels? Does that sound good to you?

Here is what Wikipedia defines as a hybrid automobile:

“A Petroleum Electric Hybrid Vehicle (PEHV) is a vehicle using an on-board rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) and a fueled power source for vehicle propulsion. The different propulsion power systems may have common subsystems or components. The HV provides better fuel economy than a conventional vehicle because the engine is smaller and may be run at speeds providing more efficiency. Other techniques may be used to recover or reduce waste energy (such as regenerative braking and shutting down the combustion engine).” - Wikipedia.com

Here is where the great blunder is. Now pay attention because this is huge. In 1993 Ford started producing Flex-Fuel vehicles for the consumer industry. Every so many years another domestic car company would jump on the band-wagon and start producing their version of the Flex-Fuel vehicle. To date, there is approximately 6 million flexible fuel vehicles on the American road. But, in 2002, only 1% of these vehicles were using the E85 fuel*. The biggest problems with Flex-Fuel is the complex model that needs to be fully implemented before we can take advantage of this technology. Here are the steps to creating this model:

  • Step One - Design and produce Flex-Fuel Vehicles for the consumer sector
  • Step Two - Find the vegetative source for the organic materials needed for the production of Ethanol
  • Step Three - Create the most efficient model for producing ethanol, making sure that more energy is created than it takes to produce it.
  • Step Four - Recruit the distribution model to start selling E85 and offer E85 fuel stations all over the nation.
  • Step Five - Motivate people to spend the same money on a less efficient fuel, so that this technology is being utilized.

To date, there is only one ethanol station for Austin, Texas, and this is a forward thinking city. In most cities there are still none. So, in reality, there are not even enough Flex-Fuel cars being utilized to their designed potential to even make a dent in utilizing this alternative energy. The six million Flex-Fuel vehicles might as well be regular gasoline models. To me, this sounds like it is still in its infancy stage. Even once fully implemented, these vehicles are still going to average 20.5 miles a gallon. Which really sucks in my opinion. Now, let’s look at this as if this was hybrid technology instead of Flex-Fuel.

Here are the steps to hybrid implementation:

  • Step One - Design and produce the hybrid automobile
  • Step Two - Sell them to the public
  • Step Three - Well… there is no step three. We are done. It has been implemented.

With this model, we would have six million more hybrid cars on the road right now. I will use the the original hybrid car for an example — the Toyota Prius. The Prius, a car that I actually own, was estimated to get 60 miles per gallon, but I get about 50+ miles per gallon on average. In 2004 the average North American car’s fuel efficiency was 20.4 miles per gallon**. Therefore, there would be 6 million more automobiles with 40 more miles per gallon fuel usage. Thats nearly a 300% increase in energy efficiency, and a 70% decrease in greenhouse gases. This would translate to an approximate reduction of 200 million barrels of oil per year, and this would have already been in application today! No other steps necessary.

With all things being equal, there would be about 6-10 times the oil conservation*** with hybrid technology than with Flex-Fuel today going forward, plus, we would also be 66% less dependent on any type of fuel. That means 66% less dependent on big “fuel” companies and the government. All of these numbers are for the basic decade-old hybrid technology. We don’t even know would could have happened if the United States jumped on this technology when it first came out over 10 years ago. By now, we could have had cars that get 100 miles per gallon. But, this is all hypothetical and wishful thinking since our government is run by complete morons.

But, don’t get me wrong. I like flex-fuel. Just not by itself. If we could combine all the technologies together to form a strong union working together, we could really do some damage to our oil dependence. Or, how about personal mobility vehicles. Now that would be a great change from one driver riding around in a 34 passenger Lincoln Navigator!

Now this is an answer to our oil crisis. What do you think?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Great resources:

http://www.hybridcarblog.com/2005/06/500-mpg-flex-fuel-plug-in-hybrids.html

* Wikipedia.com [Flexible Fuel Vehicles]
** Washington Post [Big Three Domestic Automakers Average Fuel Economy]
*** Department of Transportation [number of registered cars in US]/ National Resources Defense Council [percentage of energy for passenger and commercial use]

  • Chris
    Still, like I said before, there will always be companies battling each other for top dog of the "alternative fuel industry." There is a lot of research going on right now to even make the petrolium powered vehicles even more efficiant than they currently are. If you ever saw one of the episodes of Future Car then you would see what I'm talking about. One of the guys they interview on there makes a concept that is extremely light weight and extremely aerodynamic that boasts up to 150mpg. Also, he claims that you can drive frome the east coast to the west coast on one tank of fuel.
    The problem with ethenol is that the government is about to pull its funds from the private companies that are doing research and producing ethenol. Like I said in my post to part 1, look into the research that is being done on bio-diesel production from algea. This is by far the most promising and cheapest form of alternative fuels.
    I do agree with you that if we combine all of these technologies that we will almost completely rid ourselves of the need for fossil fuel. The most important part though is that we will be able to rid ourselves of the dependance on foreign oil. I pray that that day comes soon.
  • The racing world will be hard to convert over to electric or even hybrid. We need to get the public to do this stuff first.

    Have you seen Who Killed the Electric Car? That was pretty damn amazing to know that the electric car has already been produced and was quite successfully implemented.
  • Not only is this country run, and owned, by idiots, its also run by idiots that work for the big oil companies.

    This is a problem that most likely will not be solved by any one technology. Why not plug-in hybrids powered by ethanol? Or just plain old EV and then you rent a hybrid for the long trip. The majority of people drive less than 100 miles a day, so whats wrong with an EV? and for hybrids I still like the idea of basically an EV with a few batteries removed and a small gas/diesel generator added to greatly extend the range.

    I am happy that no one has brought up hydrogen or fuel-cells. Hydrogen is fine, except that it leaks through solid steel, which makes it tough to build a gas tank. (an extreme simplification of the problem) They are working on solutions, and abandoning hydrogen seems like the most logical solution available.

    Fuel cells seem like an option for stationary electrical generation, I just don't really want to kart around a chemical power plant in my car. Of course another way to look at them is simply as a chemical battery that can be recharged faster.

    I'm waiting for some race teams to get on board, actually there have been a couple attempts. First Panoz gave it a crack but failed to qualify. http://www.evworld.com/archives/racing/panozq9....
    They do point out a couple of minor niceties about a hybrid, you can throw out the starter and the alternator and let the electric motor take over both functions. Oh and this and the Audi that I'll mention soon are both LeMans cars meaning that this is a hybrid designed for a 24 hour race, it had problems but it was interesting to see that it was a hybrid meant to travel over 3000 miles in a single race (makes the Indy 500 look lame).

    The other interesting take on green technology has been the Audi R10, a diesel race car. I know it sounds weird to call a diesel a green technology but with the new cats and other improvements they have become fairly clean, and have always been more efficient. Audi/VW wanted to show off the green side of diesel so they even put in the scrubbers which add weight and cost HP but are obviously not required on a race car, and it won Le Mans its first time out. VW has put a lot of effort into making diesels better with their common rail technology, now they want to show off that diesels can be cool too. Oh one thing kinda crazy about diesels, a normal car uses roughly 60 psi of fuel pressure, a common rail diesel runs roughly 23,000 psi, it just sucks when you have a fuel leak, a pinhole leak come out hard enough that it could cut your fingers off.
    Anyway heres a wiki link for more info about the Audi.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi_R10

    I don't see a full electric running Le Mans anytime soon. unless they want to quickly swap a thousand pounds worth of batteries several times a race, oh and a thousand pounds of batteries are quite significant in a car that weighs 2000 lbs and 20 lbs over is noticeable.

    Alright thats enough outta me for now.
blog comments powered by Disqus