Cosmic Mysteries Solved With Parallel Universes? Part One
Big Bang Singularity Solved?
With all the world’s smartest physicists and mathematicians working to solve the decades long mystery of the big bang, there is still unanswerable questions. Before, during and a fraction of a second after is a complete mystery that has the entire scientific community in a race to figure it all out. But, what if we are trying to figure out a puzzle with only a portion of the pieces? This theory will cover the hypothetical ‘what if’. What if there are parallel universes that are hiding the missing pieces of the puzzle? But, before we go there, let’s go over some cosmic history.
History of The Big Bang
In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered a red shift in nearly all the galaxies seen from Earth. A red shift means that the galaxies are traveling away from the observer — us. This is similar to the Doppler Effect. What this implicated is that the universe is 
moving away from itself quite uniformly. At the time, this was contrary to the popular belief that the universe was static and unchanging. When this information was combined with the background microwave radiation discovery in 1964, it solidified a theory that once was thought of as garbage by Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Roman Catholic priest. His theory was that the whole universe came from a simple “primeval atom”. This theory is now lovingly referred to as The Big Bang Theory.
Scientific Problems With the Big Bang
Every time physicists try to calculate the history of the Universe moving backwards in time, from now up to the Big Bang, their math breaks down when they get fractions of a second up to the bang. This moment in time, when the whole Universe was all bound up in an infinitely massive and small object is referred to as the Singularity. But no matter what math is used, it always breaks down. This is the only thing getting in the way of solving the theory; as long as the physicists can’t make sense of it, the mystery will never be solved.
Superstring Theory and Its Conclusions
The closest they have gotten to solving this mystery is using the Superstring Theory. This theory is many physicists’ hope in solving all of the mysteries as well as bridging the gap between the science of the large (General Theory of Relativity) and the extremely small (Quantum Physics). In this quest of completing the 
String Theory many things have arisen out of this weird and wondrous science. One of the weirdest are objects called p-branes and have been used to develop an answer for this Singularity. The study of this is called Brane Cosmology. These brane cosmologists theorize that branes are two dimensional objects that contain universes. Our entire visible 4 dimensional universe is theoretically contained in one of these higher dimensional branes. Now the results of this physics also state that there are multiple branes with each brane containing another universe, each having a different set of laws, mathematics and matter.
With this theory, a question arose between 3 scientists that may be one of the most important pertaining to the problem with The Big Bang. What if two branes containing different universes ran into each other? What would be the implications? Could these higher dimensional branes that contain very large amounts of energy create matter if contact is introduced? Well, by using Einstein’s popular equation, E=MC2, you could create matter from energy if you have enough. Could this be where our matter came from? Could this be the big bang, the supposed contact of two branes? This would also solve one of the other most perplexing questions. What existed before the Big Bang? Did time even exist before the Big Bang? If we use this theory then the brane just did not have any matter in it and time did exist.
Is This The Answer?
Well, we may never know. But, I will ask this: If this theory answered the singularity of The Big Bang, what about the singularity contained within Black Holes? This singularity still exists and will not, in my opinion, be explained with Branes. So what does this mean? In my opinion the elephant is still in the room, and for us to say this is “the theory of everything” we need to keep searching… or do we? Well, getting back to the missing pieces of the puzzle I discussed in the introduction of this article, I will explain my theory. Its the theory that may link up the Big Bang with the black hole, dark matter with the mystery of galactic rotation and galactic orbiting, and why tachyons have still gone undiscovered. I welcome you to continue this discovery in Part Two of Cosmic Mysteries Solved With Parallel Universes (Coming Soon)?
Recommended DVDs:
Recommended Books:
5 Comments so far
Leave a reply
New Scientist
The Onion
Media Matters
Newsvine
Associated Press
Interesting thoughts. But what about looking at it from another angle–that consciousness precedes form–as explained by David Bohm? That is, an implicate order (unmanifested order)unfolded into this gross material universe which Bohm called the explicate order. And the explicate order enfolds back into the implicate after a period of time. If there was a big bang, it was all latent in the implicate, like a whim.
This explains oneness. Everything in the universe is consciousness striving to know itself. This also explains evolution, as long as you understand that consciousness precedes the form.
As I could agree with what you say, I tend to leave out such opinions when referring to an article dedicated to science.
What I believe you are saying is how consciousness is the root of creation. And how this collective conscious, pure energy or “God” only had knowledge of what “it” was and wanted to experience its pure potentiality through physical awareness. So, “it” created the universe for this grand expirement of experience through the existince of daulity; light and cold, good and evil, sad and happy. And, to truely know thyself you need to know or have experience of what you are not. To do this you need the duality of this physical reality. All of this experience of what “you are not” and “what you are” is leading you to the realization of who you, which is everyone, the collective conscious or “God”, truely are.
On a spiritual level, I would agree with you as that is a well known ideology that is conveyed in many books. One of my favorite would be Conversations With God. On a scientific level, I would say that since this almost can never be proven through physics and mathematics, it is quite out of context unless the article is about metaphysics or spirituality.
To add to my comment above Greg, I would like to say how there is some, might a say sketchy, but definitely interesting, scientific evidence of how we could all be made of the same thing, or the same energy and matter.
Feynman has theorized that all electron are the same electron being bounced back and forth in time replicating itself. When a gamma ray interacts with an atom, it produces and electron-positron pair. The electron goes off to live its normal life, but the positron, being the anti-particle of an electron, has a very short life. As it flies off it will inevitably run into an electron causing subsequent annihilation. The by products of this annihilation would be a reverse of the original reaction, creating an electron and a photon. This photon inturns runs into an electron causing a positron. This original electron, if you will, just bounces back and forth from positron to electron back to positron. In essence all electrons are the same particle, just in different time states.
One could extrapolate that all matter is made up of the same particles. And we all are one, energy and all. Whether this is fact or not, we may never know but it is quite interesting to think about.
Thanks for your comments, you definitely add another sense of perspective to the site. We thank you for you interaction.
[…] In part one of this article we went over the history of the Big Bang, the holes in the theory and how scientists have tried to piece together an answer to the mysteries. Let’s go over some of the basics. […]